[editor-surveyor]

That is my point. HIV most surely does NOT cause AIDS.

This is a complete sham. No blind test has ever been done, and will not be done because the result would shut down their golden goose.

The supposed ‘HIV’ antibody is present in thousands of times more people that do not exhibit AIDS than do.

Their solution to that dilemma is to push death dealing “AIDS” drugs down their throats until they die.

[neverdem]

No blind test has ever been done, and will not be done because the result would shut down their golden goose.

Blind tests are for nominal treatments versus a placebo, not satisfying Koch's postulates. From the 2nd link in comment# 75:

The last two postulates stipulate that inoculating the organism into an animal model (i.e., exposing or infecting the animal) leads to the same disease and that the organism is recoverable from that animal. The evidence satisfying these postulates was established in 1997, when Francis J. Novembre, Ph.D., and colleagues from Emory University in Atlanta, GA, published in the Journal of Virology that a chimpanzee inoculated with HIV ten years earlier had developed an AIDS-defining OI(opportunistic infection). Prior to the OI, the HIV RNA viral load had increased (partially documenting recovery of the organism from the animal model) and the CD4 cell count had decreased in the chimpanzee. Cultures of blood from the animal also were positive for HIV, establishing recoverability of the organism. Subsequently, blood from that chimp was transfused into a second, healthy chimpanzee. This second chimpanzee later had an increase in the HIV viral load and a decrease in the CD4 cell count.

Prior to this 1997 report, fulfillment of Koch's third and fourth postulates was lacking. Interestingly, the incubation period for clinical AIDS in this chimpanzee, with whom humans share 98% gene homology (structural similarity), was essentially equivalent to the average incubation period in humans -- ten years.

The supposed ‘HIV’ antibody is present in thousands of times more people that do not exhibit AIDS than do.

Give HIV enough time to reduce their CD4 counts. Once that happens AIDS defining diseases occurs. With the newer drugs for HIV they don't develop AIDS defining diseases because their CD4 counts are normal.

Their solution to that dilemma is to push death dealing “AIDS” drugs down their throats until they die.

The newer drugs don't have the adverse effects like AZT and earlier drugs.

P.S. They isolate HIV directly in tests called viral loads. It's not just antibody testing for HIV.