The use of the word "need" grants the government total power, as the government is the only one allowed to define what is "needed" and what is not. We are a Constitutional Republic of limited government, not a Marxist society based on "To each according to his need".
1 posted on
03/01/2013 6:42:47 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
He made the social justice argument.
You should be allowed to keep the wealth that you need.
Right out of Karl Marx's manifesto. Surprised? I think not.
2 posted on
03/01/2013 7:01:42 AM PST by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: marktwain
NEED
Just another in the now endless list of words that are now bastardized by the they hordes!
Words I try not to use
.
Semper Blogging!
*****
3 posted on
03/01/2013 7:03:05 AM PST by
gunnyg
("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
To: marktwain
Heck, in the big picture, life is so transitory that we don't really "need" food/shelter/clothing either.
I keep telling the Leftists i work around that the more power they give to the government, the closer they come to being livestock. The progression is: Slavery, where they depend upon the government and are usually treated humanely because of the laws. Pet-hood where they become property of the government and the laws against putting them down are pretty irrelevant. Finally reaching Livestock, they exist only at the pleasure and need of the government and have as many rights as the cow that donated the flesh for that nice steak.
I usually get a bunch of empty (bovine) stares.
4 posted on
03/01/2013 7:14:59 AM PST by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: marktwain
“NEED”...wanting what someone else has worked for.
“GREED”...wanting to keep what one has worked for.
“COMPASSION”...the policy by which politicians arrange the redistribution
7 posted on
03/01/2013 8:50:17 AM PST by
Roccus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson