[Nachum]

Comrade, tell KGB all. We will be friends. We will give you extra portion of Wodka.

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Watch this guys. This is where we are headed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1KhmKZvd0E

[moovova]

Nazis

[PeevedPatriot]

“Certain large employers who fail to offer affordable plans that meet this minimum value may be assessed a tax penalty if any of their full-time employees receive a premium tax credit through the [healthcare] exchange,” the rule’s document reads.

That's only part of the story. If anyone in the employee's household qualifies for a subsidy then the employer will likely face additional taxes, depending on certain variables. That's why the IRS and employers will be in regular contact about household income, not just employee income. Employment discrimination was built into the law. Say one spouse loses a job or benefits. The other employed spouse risks termination if the additional costs to his employer are too burdensome. Doesn't have to be a spouse that puts you at risk. As I understand it it's anyone in your household.

[lowbridge]

bump

[liberalh8ter]

I thought the IRS was Obama’s pit bull of enforcement. Apparently the entire government is charged with enforcement. I guess they have no other function to perform.