[TXnMA]

Our Constitutionally-protected right is to "bear" arms.

The Constitution says nothing about exposing our upper extremities.

Perhaps "bare" looks cute or humorous to you -- but to most folks it just looks ignorant -- and reflects badly on the rest of us who are fighting for our right to "bear" arms -- which is the specific Constitutional point this da*ned activist court just assaulted.

[SampleMan]

Interesting. I've deeply considered your comment and have almost no interest in it whatsoever.

Bear is to carry, bare is to make visible.

The deeper point you missed, was that if you are bearing a weapon, but cannot conceal it, you must be able to then bare it. A serious and humorous point.

Churchill, John Adams, and many others were able to find levity, while simultaneously fighting for their existence. I won't be lectured about my ability to do so.

[SampleMan]

Interesting. I've deeply considered your comment and have almost no interest in it whatsoever.

Bear is to carry, bare is to make visible.

The deeper point you missed, was that if you are bearing a weapon, but cannot conceal it, you must be able to then bare it. A serious and humorous point.

Churchill, John Adams, and many others were able to find levity, while simultaneously fighting for their existence. I won't be lectured about my ability to do so.