Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

Exactly.

Now, if I was being ‘unreasonable’, I’d have made it a point that they/Country of origin pays for the return, and those deported micro-stamped.

If we can’t get D.C. to enforce their own laws, what the hell are we complaining about when the GOPe continues to go Dem-lite??


9 posted on 02/22/2013 12:27:54 PM PST by i_robot73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73
Reasonable or not your suggestions do nothing to further a real solution. They aren't really harsher than current laws for the most part either.

RE: Employers - fine of $1M/per, adjusted for inflation

I don't know how fines range but current law includes criminal sanctions ie prison time.

RE: Entitlements - they are Unconstitutional to begin with, they shouldn’t even be an option for any illegal, regardless of circumstance.

If you would deny anyone true emergency care then you're worse than an illegal alien. You're a monster.

RE: Anchors - moot point if they followed the actually verbiage of the 14th.

That's a moot point since we have SCOTUS decisions that support the current anchor baby policy. Congress can change that thus my recommendation.

I’d have made it a point that they/Country of origin pays for the return, and those deported micro-stamped.

A useless waste of taxpayer money. Employ the things I listed and they will self-deport en-mass and pay for it themselves. It's redundant and self-punitive to make legal requirements for repayment from the country of origin.

10 posted on 02/22/2013 12:45:31 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson