Which only proves that you are either senile or stupid. What I posted was, "If it is as simple as you state,then you must believe that firearm confiscation would reduce or eliminate murder."
Simply put, YOU must believe. Because YOU believe simply, that trigger locks and gun safes would have prevented a cold blooded, premeditated murdering POS from slaughtering defenseless women and children.
See. You’re stuck on stupid.
OK Brainiac. Let’s try to approach this from your point of view. Scratch that. I’m not putting my head up my butt.
Anyway, try to follow.
1. This thread was about Adam Lanza.
2. I said that trigger locks or a gun safe would have prevent him from having access to his MOM’S gun.
3. You spassed out, stuck your finger in your butt, smelled it and started babbling nonsense.
4. More intelligent stuff from me.
5. More stuck on stupid by you.
6. In latest babble you accurately state that I believe “simply, that trigger locks and gun safes would have prevented a cold blooded, premeditated murdering POS from slaughtering defenseless women and children.” snicker...
7. Yes, I know this will come as a shock to you, but trigger locks and gun safes ABSOLUTELY would have prevented cold blooded, premeditated murdering POS ADAM LANZA from slaughtering defenseless women and children with his mom’s weapons. Simply, absolutely.
Period.