[what's up]

He won’t be perfect, but certainly better than what we have, and better than Hillary or Bill Clinton

Unfortunately there's too many people looking for perfect. One wrong statement and a candidate goes to the "RINO" list. Nobody can live up to that measure.

Jeb Bush is just saying he'd work closely with the Senate to get things done. Unlike Obama who is completely disengaged.

I have no problem with that.

[castlegreyskull]

“Unfortunately there’s too many people looking for perfect. One wrong statement and a candidate goes to the “RINO” list. Nobody can live up to that measure.

Jeb Bush is just saying he’d work closely with the Senate to get things done. Unlike Obama who is completely disengaged.

I have no problem with that.”

I agree whole completely. I know that I will get piled-on for thinking or openly admitting that I believe Jeb Bush should run. However, he was a capable Govenor. I loved both his father and George W. they love the U.S.A. and protected this country well. I just don’t believe the next Reagan is on the horizon. If he is, I won’t support Jeb in spite of him.

[x]

You're right. But to master the Senate, you have to have served in Congress long enough to understand how things work and who works things.

That's not to say that senators or representatives make good presidents. They usually don't. A president needs administrative experience.

But the experience of a new president negotiating with Congress for the first time often is not a pretty one. It was like that with Bush's brother. What Obama's excuse is, I don't know.