I will fight to protect liberty--to the death, if need be. But when a call is made to establish "spiritual renewal", that is where the association ends. I explained this in my post. Did you read it? Paul is making a huge mistake to broach the topic with Beck.
Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath Christ with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? (2 Corinthians 6:14)
I know from your comment that you have no clue what I'm talking about. Nor do I expect you to, but I put it forward as the Biblical bases for my rejecting a call to establish "spiritual renewal" with any "infidel" (unbeliever) or worse (someone who believes in a false Christ). For you see, this is the most important issue. More important than this passing age (or de jure constitutional arrangement).
If you were to die today (or in the near future defending liberty), where will you spend eternity? In heaven with God, or somewhere else? Why?
We cannot defend liberty successfully unless we stand together on the spiritual basis of liberty. Regardless of our theological differences, we must make that stand.
I don’t agree with Mormon theology any more than you do but I understand that they are people of faith and family (for the most part — there is always a Harry Reid or two) who are strong defenders of liberty. And right now, that’s where the fight is. I’ll take the allies I can get.
How arrogant and self-serving. I understand your point completely -- I just don't agree with you. Of course, I don't expect you to understand that distinction.