Posted on 02/14/2013 8:18:42 AM PST by SeekAndFind
So what will this new plan for deficit reduction look like? Ten years of cuts get turned into ten months of tax hikes and cuts in equal measure. The tax hikes in the plan equal that gained by Barack Obama in the January standoff for the rest of this year. The cuts fall mainly in defense spending and agricultural subsidies. Will that fly? Only like the domesticated turkey that it is:
CBS News has learned that the Senate Democrats’ long-awaited plan to avert the sequester, being announced by Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash, Thursday, would replace the 10-year sequester for the rest of 2013 — 10 months — with $120 billion in spending cuts and new tax revenue, split 50-50.
Most of the revenue would come from implementing what’s known as the Buffett Rule, named after investor Warren Buffett. The rule would cap deductions and loopholes for millionaires so they pay at least 30 percent of their salary in taxes. Senate Democrats tried and failed to pass the Buffett Rule last year.
The spending cuts would come from eliminating agriculture subsidies and from trimming the defense budget, though not as drastically as the sequester would.
Republicans have said all along that they will not provide any more revenue in a sequestration replacement. They provided Obama with $60 billion in new annual revenue already (at least in static-analysis terms) in the New Year’s Day fiscal cliff deal, with almost nothing in spending cuts. Furthermore, they don’t have to do anything. They can just stand pat and wait for the sequester to hit, and they get their spending cuts — actually, just cuts in the rate of spending increases — without having to hike taxes any further, especially for a new version of the AMT that Congress just finally fixed after more than four decades of having to deal with its ill-considered structure.
And if Democrats really wanted to tempt Republicans, the cuts would have come from somewhere other than defense. Given a choice between tough cuts to the Pentagon and no tax hikes, or slightly-less tough cuts and taking another $60 billion a year out of this foundering economy, most Republicans will choose the former over the latter.
Besides, the Senate has to pass its version first. Boehner has made it clear that he won’t be negotiating outside of normal order this year. Let the Senate try pushing through the second tax hike of the year, and let the House pass its own version of sequester replacement, and then a conference committee can negotiate as the system is designed. Until the Senate actually acts to pass budgets, this is nothing more than a press release.
The democrats in the senate can talk all they want about this but they cannot attach it to any bill because the House has not sent the senate any revenue bill yet this congress.
Better late then never. Boehner not negotiating with the jackass in the WH is long overdue. Let the country see the Senate rats in action at least.
“CBS News has learned”
Think I’ll wait for a more reputable source.
“Boehner not negotiating with the jackass in the WH is long overdue.”
don’t hold your breath.
If you don’t feel like charlie brown about to get the football snatched by lucy....you should.
The Mass / Kerry Seat and the Menedez Seat when they can no longer run the block and he gets sent to the bigga house.
But McConnell IMHO is too challenged to play that chess game to plan to make those two victories....
““CBS News has learned”
Think I’ll wait for a more reputable source.”
Any magazine with a picture of a Kardashian on the cover is a more reliable news source.
10-4
The Dem plan is simple.
1. Raise taxes.
2. Make empty promises about cuts, sometime, maybe, in the future.
But there’s plenty of money for the following? Insane.
Obama to push universal preschool proposal
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2988474/posts
“...pay at least 30 percent of their salary in taxes.”
My understanding is that for the super-rich their money is in wealth, not salary. Maybe I’m wrong.
RE: My understanding is that for the super-rich their money is in wealth, not salary.
They do have -— DIVIDENDS FROM STOCKS, INCOME FROM BONDS, INCOME FROM RENTALS, INTEREST FROM BANK ACCOUNTS (NOT ONLY HERE BUT OVERSEAS), CAPITAL GAINS FROM SALES OF ASSETS.
Capital gains taxes are going up after the fiscal cliff deal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.