I don’t make the assumption that the elections were on the level, but I haven’t seen any hard evidence that the vote fraud, that I am sure did happen, actually decided the election. There were a few postings and news stories questioning the results of individual races. Allen West’s district stands out in my mind. There was some news stories about irregularities in certain cities. Philadelphia comes to mind. There were also some stories about questionable swing state results, but I have not seen anybody put it all together to prove that any of it decided the national election. I would be very happy if it could be proved, so the election could be contested. Until or unless that happens, we will be dealing with the current administration.
I think the best thing we can do is to stay involved in the process, especially at the local level, and try to getter better candidates nominated. None of the candidates in the last election cycle were very appealing. Romney was a consensus candidate of last resort. His final vote tally reflects the lack of enthusiasm that most of us here on FR felt. So, I think the majority of American voters are indeed fickle and voted for Obama or did not vote for Romney for reasons other than policy or character. I wish the electorate was the same as during the 80s, but it is not. Wishing it so, will not change things. Only hard work and activism on the local level will make things better.
My view is that vote fraud may have put Baraq over the top, but he had to get close enough to cheat based on real votes.
The fact that he was able to do so with such a horrible record makes me worried about the future.
2 generations of progressive controlled education +
MSM as a full partner in the regime +
unlimited and govt supported illegals =
DIM FUTURE