Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

The scanner traffic regarding the orders to ‘burn’ was not meant for the public.

Anyone care to guess when they are going to outlaw scanners, such as they are (I believe) in some jurisdictions?


900 posted on 02/13/2013 10:10:30 AM PST by elpinta (Jer. 10:23 - It really holds true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies ]


To: elpinta

They did try to shut it down last night but my feed came back just in time to hear the whole thing go down. They also tried to make everyone stop ‘tweeting’. We might ought to start re learning some of the old technology to communicate again before the SHTF and Obama hits the kill switch on the Internet.


901 posted on 02/13/2013 10:26:13 AM PST by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies ]

To: elpinta
No need to outlaw scanners...Big gov are changing them all to digital encrypted instead of analog...

Eventually, you won't be able to hear anything on your scanners.

904 posted on 02/13/2013 11:14:01 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies ]

To: elpinta

>> “The scanner traffic regarding the orders to ‘burn’ was not meant for the public.” <<

.
True, but some cops are so ignorant that they fail to realize that their coded squelch transmission has no effect on a receiver that has coding turned off.

The Mensa squad.

They cannot outlaw receiving a broadcast signal, but if they should start encrypting their signal, they can outlaw cracking the encryption.


908 posted on 02/13/2013 1:03:47 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson