Your opinion is evident, and it is just that an opinion, it has no force of law and for you to pretend otherwise is childish.
The fact that the Constitution does not actually offer detailed definition of NBC does not give you license to interpret it to suit you view.
Thee is no legal opinion on the NBC status of Rubio other than personal opinions like your own.
I have no way of predicting what a corrupt court will decide, if they ever decide to take up the issue, but common sense tells me that there is a definition of NBC that was well understood by the Founders else they would not of had to include themselves in the exceptions to the rule.
There exists a significant kabal of NBC advocates here on FR, so go commiserate with them and leave us simple minded Patriots to our own devices.
RE: Your opinion is evident, and it is just that an opinion, it has no force of law and for you to pretend otherwise is childish.
I asked you a question, I did not form an opinion. NOTHING IS EVIDENT UNLESS I FORM AN OPINION. You are ascribing omniscience to yourself.
RE: The fact that the Constitution does not actually offer detailed definition of NBC does not give you license to interpret it to suit you view
Again, I ask you a question and I REALLY want to know -— When the framers used the term — NATURAL BORN -— did they explain what they meant and how they Understood that term?
If so, I would like you to show me a CLEAR, UNEQUIVOCAL, WRITTEN PIECE from Madison, or anyone who signed the constitution.
That’s ALL I WANT FROM YOU. I withhold my personal opinion until I get one. And I reserve the right to ask more questions should they arise.
That there exists a significant kabal of NBC advocates on FR does not give you license to read my motives.
This is the nth iteration of my question, I am still waiting for an answer.