Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
Their findings were twofold: the health checks they studied did not reduce morbidity – the risk of illness – and they also had no effect on the risk of death

So you have them now saying that early detection and prevention are a failure?

9 posted on 02/11/2013 3:10:52 AM PST by EBH ( The 2nd Amendment exists for times like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EBH

There was an article, I think it was in the New England Journal of Medicine, that concluded the economic costs of almost all screenings outweighed the costs of treating the subsequent disease. The costs of the screening and false positives was greater than the treatment of the disease. The economic benefit for screening was a benefit to the individual in which the disease was detected but an economic loss for the society as a whole. One exception was the early detection of diabetes.


11 posted on 02/11/2013 4:05:58 AM PST by wfu_deacons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson