My point that there is good reason to distrust and closely examine the LAPD.
Dorner could have taken a peaceful and legal route to what he claims was an injustice. Instead he murders three innocent people all because he says he lost his job(s) and his name was tarnished.
Ya wouldn't try to kid me, now would ya Grannie?
Considering Dorner has murdered three innocent people, I can see why you wouldn't be too eager to consider his testimony.
And I can see why YOU would like to misdirect attention to Dorner's testimony rather than the multiple legal decisions against the LAPD, and accuracy of information regarding LAPD, which is the subject of all my posts to you.
I would remind you that the subject of the thread is: Why Did Some Local Media Edit Out Anti-NRA, Pro-Obama Portions of Cop-Killers Supposed Manifesto? NOT DORNER
This is about the manipulation and suppression of information by the Statist Socialist LSM running cover for the Statist Socialist government in general and the reasons. NOT DORNER
The fact that Dorner is a bad guy in no way exonerates the LAPD from the illegal activities that resulted in court decisions against them, except in the minds of statist boot licking subjects.
Like the Edit Out Media, you would use the same device to edit out of the discussion the history of illegal acts by LAPD by misdirection to Dorner.
Dorner really bad, therefore LAPD always and forever good.