Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oilmen hope to make new history at Spindletop
Energy Information Administration ^ | February 7, 2013 | Emily Pickrell

Posted on 02/07/2013 7:20:12 AM PST by thackney


The name evokes an oil discovery that made history. When a well piercing the salt dome near Beaumont first gushed in 1901, it introduced a cheap supply of commercial energy that transformed the oil industry and American life.

More than 100 years later, the oilmen are back at Spindletop, calculating how to extract even more oil from deeper levels at the hallowed site, which they believe may contain millions more barrels of crude.

Two exploration companies are working together to finance and build a well at Spindletop, based on new data that allows them to better predict where profitable pockets of oil and gas may be buried.

The team is motivated by the adage that the best place to look for oil is where it has already been found.

“Spindletop gave rise to some of the largest oil and gas companies that are still around today,” said Mark Wixom, vice president of Salt Lake City-based International Petroleum, a 50 percent investor in the project, along with Bakersfield, Calif.-based E&B Natural Resources. “We could be the people to finish the next chapter of Spindletop. We think the book’s not done yet.”

Spindletop was named for the shape of a hill that rose on the coastal plain, pushed up over eons by an underground salt dome.

In 1901, self-trained geologist Patillo Higgins successfully proved his theorythat oil lay under that hill. Since then geologists have learned that salt domes often have large pools of oil trapped along their edges.

But the Spindletop pioneers didn’t know the full depth of the oil-rich formation called reservoir rock, and the technology for finding out didn’t exist for decades after oil gushed there in 1901.

In the 1990s, however, aided by new methods of collecting data, geologists found oil north of Spindle­top at a deeper level, called the Yegua Formation. The formation, a layer of rock and sand that stretches along the Gulf Coast about 11,000 feet to 17,000 feet beneath the earth’s surface, has become one of the most active conventional drilling areas in the United States.

But anecdotal wisdom held that the oil-rich sand didn’t extend to Spindletop.

In 2000, a team of independent geologists – Bill Whaling, Craig Gentry, Leo Newport and Alan Balser – decided to revisit a question people still asked in Beaumont: Is there more oil at Spindletop?

Previous production there peaked in 1927 at 21 million barrels, according to the Texas State Historical Association.

The four spent more than $5 million on relatively new 3-D seismic data depicting the geology beneath a 7-square-mile region around Spindletop, and discovered evidence of the Yegua reservoir rock.

Analyzing the depths

The ongoing venture, which bought out the original geologists, has spent a decade analyzing and interpreting the data, trying to understand what the map of subterranean geography reveals.

“It is straightforward to make a map,” said Chet Pohle, a geophysicist for E&B Natural Resources. “What isn’t straightforward is where your sand or hydrocarbon reservoirs will be. The data is like a giant three dimensional puzzle that you have to figure out. You have to make predictions, and that’s what takes the time.”

Based on initial interpretations of the seismic data, an earlier investor drilled a well next to the salt dome in 2003 and found indications of Yegua sand. But the well hit the salt dome itself, making it unusable.

E&B joined the project in 2007 and drilled a second well.

The drilling resulted in three discoveries, proving that reservoir sands containing oil and gas are present at the Yegua level.

But the well was less productive than investors hoped because it encountered faults near Spindletop’s salt dome.

Faults are disruptions in reservoir rock that essentially divide it into small, uneconomical reservoirs. Identifying possible fault lines is a key part of the site selection process.

Possible cost: $8 million

E&B and International Petroleum hope to benefit from the additional data gathered from that well, proposing to drill a little farther from the salt dome to avoid the faults that can sap production.

“You need to have a big enough area to produce, to ever hope to make your money back,” said Brian Kalinec, a consulting geophysicist for International Petroleum. “I thought because of the complexity of the salt dome, you would have a better chance of identifying opportunities a little bit farther away.”

The team believes that the combination of the seismic dataand the experience with the two earlier wells have enabled them to identify a location close enough to the salt dome for resource rock to exist, but far enough away to avoid the faults.

The team will present its strategy Thursday at the NAPE convention in Houston – an annual swap meet, formerly called the North American Prospect Expo, for buying and selling oil properties and attracting investors. They’re seeking additional participants to help finance a Spindletop well that could cost as much as $8 million.

“We have been able to figure out a story that makes good geologic sense,” Kalinec said. “All the geological and geophysical pieces fit together and support the story. That is a real key thing in any prospect – and it makes it easier to present, because it presents itself.”

They also presented the proposal last year at the annual NAPE event, but investors raised concerns about faults. Since then the team has fine-tuned its analysis and interpretation of the data.

“We have addressed the issue of where we believe the potential pay sands are, so we have turned our efforts into better highlighting where we think the faulting will occur,” Kalinec said.

‘Have to pay your dues’

The team also has to convince investors that the well would be able to make money.

“Entrepreneurs haven’t always thought through well enough the actual economics of how to make a well profitable,” said Carl Tricoli, a managing partner at Denham Capital, who is attending the Houston conference in search of potential investments.

“You may be producing all this oil, but are you producing it profitably? The No. 1 reason people don’t get financing is because the economics don’t justify it,” Tricoli noted.

The team is watching the economics closely as well. If successful, the well could generate enough revenue to become profitable within months and could produce for several years.

But each partner has invested millions of dollars already. And while their hunches are based on decades of experience, all are mindful of the complexity of the salt dome, and the risk the project won’t be profitable.

“It took Patillo Higgins seven tries to get it in the shallower region,” said Bud Tippens, director of land for E&B Natural Resources, recalling the Spindletop pioneer. “You have to pay your dues and have your failures, then have the perseverance to make sure you don’t quit. We know the sand’s there – we found it. We’ve just got to find it in a bigger tank.”

TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: energy; oil

1 posted on 02/07/2013 7:20:17 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Luckily there was no EPA then or the fines for allowing that free flowing spill would have broke the investors.

2 posted on 02/07/2013 7:25:14 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
The team also has to convince investors that the well would be able to make money.

Where's Dad Joiner when you need him? ;)


3 posted on 02/07/2013 7:25:14 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Lots of investors did go broke anyways.

Between the folks selling 2,000% or more shares of a well, to the boom and bust of a market supply outrunning it’s demand, then outrunning the supply, there was an incredible amount of dollars lost (and made by others).

The overabundance of wells at Spindletop led to a rapid decline in production. After yielding 17,500,000 barrels of oil in 1902 (~50k/d), the Spindletop wells were down to 10,000 barrels a day in February 1904. A second boom came with discovery on the flanks of the salt dome.

Handbook of Texas Online

4 posted on 02/07/2013 7:35:15 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

We are awash in oil. We need to build refineries to keep up with these discoveries and drive the price down. What’s the hold up?

5 posted on 02/07/2013 7:48:24 AM PST by vpintheak (Occupy your Brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

We have more refineries now than we can use. We have become a net exporter of refined product because of that. We may not have built a new refinery in 30 years, but we spent that time upgrading and expanding the existing ones. The average US refinery is twice as big as they were back then.

The high price of gasoline is from the high price of oil. We need more oil production, not refineries.

6 posted on 02/07/2013 7:55:51 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

And the inefficient pee wee refineries have closed.

7 posted on 02/07/2013 7:58:14 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I grew up in Beaumont—In the shadow of Spindletop.

In 1951, upon the 50th anniversary of Spindletop, every school child in Beaumont from jr. high through high school, had to write an essay on the subject. The title of our essays was “Spindletop—where oil became an industry”.

Little did I know that I would one day marry an “oil man”, and follow him around the country as we were transferred from place to place.

It’s been a good life!-—for going on 52 years now!

8 posted on 02/07/2013 8:07:03 AM PST by basil (basil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Thanks for the info. Lets drill baby drill!

9 posted on 02/07/2013 8:13:26 AM PST by vpintheak (Occupy your Brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Whoa !

MDU and Calumet plan to build a 20,000 bbl/day refinery in South Dakota !

10 posted on 02/07/2013 3:37:43 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

(l-r) Geophysicist Brain Kalinec of I.P. Petroleum and Chet Pohle Geophysics Manager of E&B Natural Resources along with
E&B Natural Resources Director of Land G.R. "Bud" Tippens, Wednesday, February 6, 2013. The Three are planning to drill for
oil in Spindletop, and have put together a presentation for the NAPE conference. (Billy Smith II / Houston Chronicle)
Photo: Billy Smith II, Staff

Read More....

Horses pull a wagon through an oil field at Spindletop in 1901.

A pig roams past shops in Gladys City, the boomtown at Spindletop.

A Spindletop drilling crew in 1901.

The above Monument is now in the Town
of Sour Lake, some 20 miles west of beaumont
which marks the first producing well for what
was to become the Texas Company or TEXACO.
The Texas Company Fee NO.3

The orginal marker used to be in the old oil field
at the well location.

11 posted on 02/07/2013 4:23:52 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: deport

I should have said:
North Dakota...

12 posted on 02/07/2013 8:16:47 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson