As it should be. ANYONE with prior knowledge of this horrible crime and did NOTHING to stop it SHOULD be harmed (see my tagline for explanation)
It is time to stop harboring criminals, personally involved or whom had prior knowledge to the crime and therefore could have prevented it.
the flaw in that stance is what constitutes prior knowlege?
Would someone who knew Lanza was on meds and that his mom had guns be found culpable?
I think that’s where the Left wants to go with this. Make examples out of people who may have known things but didn’t put the pieces together, or think that what they knew rose to the level of informing on Lanza or his mom.
Hindsight is always 20/20, right?
Bascally this could be used to set the stage for a situation that encourages people to overreact and turn their friends and neighbors over to the police under less than appropriate circumstances.