Yes, I can see your point.
If there are other suspects that are involved that the police do not want to tip off by releasing news of the investigation, that would make sense.
If there are other suspects that were involved, would they not be considered dangerous and a potential hazard to the public at large?
Should not APBs be posted attempting to find the whereabouts of the other perpetrators?
Here now comes the but(t)...
But, if Adam did act on his own with no confederates, or other conspirators, then why the delay in issuing a report?
The one undeniable transformative change that Obama has brought this country with the completion of his first term is the politicization of the Just-Us department. What should be of concern to every American is this rush to pass legislation on the emotion of the Sandy Hook killings.
Once again, the founders of this nation understood that the nation should not swing back and forth on the emotion of the moment but rather that whatever legislation is produced is the result of a deliberate and temperate process.
Is there no report in an effort to bolster this rush to legislation? That should be the concern of every American.
What should be of concern to every American is this rush to pass legislation on the emotion of the Sandy Hook killings.I agree with you. I don't know what to believe or not to believe about Sandy Hook, but I do know that our leader doesn't always tell the truth. And he has no remorse whatsoever concerning the bloodshed of holy innocents either, that's for sure.
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
I think you’re still missing the point. There are not only 2 propositions here. It’s not a matter of if he acted alone, or if he didn’t act alone. You’re not accounting for what is the most likely actual situation, which is that the police are required to investigate whether he acted alone or not, even if they have no evidence of other conspirators.
They must investigate it, even if simply to rule it out, and until they do that investigation and rule it out, they can’t just assume there are no other potential suspects out there. If they did make that assumption, and reveal a bunch of evidence mid-investigation, but then found out there were accomplices later on, they could blow their chances of prosecuting them.