Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SECURE AMERICA

“You can disagree on if women should be there or not just don’t neglect to realize that they already are.........”

They are not in infantry units and they are not in Special Forces. The ones that are there are in support roles. The ones that are flying any type of aircraft in direct combat have been put there in DIRECT VIOLATION of stated Congressional law.

If I had my druthers there would be no women at all in the military. I am a retired Air Force senior NCO and in all my years of active service never saw one job that woman could do better than a man. Fighting wars is a man’s responsibility. We have enough men to go off and do the fighting for this country, without sending women to die because feminist and politically-correct chickenhawk democrats want to see them die alongside men. It’s all BS. A nation that sends it’s women to fight it’s wars ain’t worth defending. The Kenyan King is destroying this country from within, starting with the mission effectiveness of the US military. He wants to see us relegated to a third world country.


10 posted on 02/06/2013 7:21:39 AM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet

This notion of placing woman is just so easy to refute. Many of you may have heard of a little dustup called World War II. At the peak of United States involvement in that war there were 16 ½ million personnel in uniform, many of them women. We also had over 400,000 personnel killed in the line of duty, against the toughest battlefield enemies this country has ever had to face, ones that were capable of and often did inflict shattering BATTLEFIELD defeats upon our sea, land and air forces. Despite this no one saw any need to place women into combat roles that had the responsibility to directly close with, engage, and destroy the enemy..

Today with a much smaller and almost hand picked elite Armed Forces, and a population base that is more than twice as large as that during World War II, there is even less need for it now than then.

This entire idiocy is being propelled by the demand for selfish feminists to qualify for chairmanship of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, nothing more and nothing less than that.

This has absolutely nothing to do with enhancing the ability of the Armed Forces to fight, rather it will weaken it if for no other reason than the logistics strain that it will place on the Armed Forces for separate housing and the like.

The effort required to obtain a relative few qualified women will not result in anything remotely resembling any accepted model of effeciency, but since that is NOT the object any way, why worry about that? This is merely another sop to the perverted Cultural Marxist notion of fairness and equality and another step on the road of “fundamental transformation” of the vital institutions of this nation.


11 posted on 02/06/2013 7:40:05 AM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson