Skip to comments.Rail traffic reflects more oil production, less coal-fired electricity generation
Posted on 02/05/2013 6:49:47 AM PST by thackney
The record increase in U.S. crude oil production during 2012 and the significant decline in coal use for domestic electricity generation were reflected in the movement of those two commodities by rail last year. Crude oil and petroleum products accounted for the biggest increase in railcar loadings among commodities in 2012, while coal had the largest decline. Notwithstanding these changes, coal remained by far the dominant category of carload shipments, accounting for 41% of total carloads, compared to a 4% share for all petroleum and petroleum products combined.
Last year, the amount of crude oil and petroleum products delivered by rail increased 46% over 2011, or almost 171,000 carloads, according to the Association of American Railroads (AAR), which tracks movement of commodities by rail. Crude oil accounted for an estimated 38% of the combined deliveries in the oil and petroleum products category during 2012, up from 3% in 2009. The trade group says that crude oil was responsible for nearly all of the growth last year in carloadings in this category.
Typically, about 90% of the crude oil and petroleum products in the United States is transported by pipeline. However, more crude is being moved by rail from areas of the country seeing a boost in oil production, such as North Dakota's Bakken Shale formation, that do not have adequate pipeline infrastructure to transport the oil to refineries. U.S. crude oil production increased by a record 780,000 barrels per day in 2012.
The commodity with the biggest decline in railcar loadings during 2012 was coal, which was down about 726,000 carloads, or nearly 11%, to just over 6 million carloads.
More than 70% of the coal burned by power plants for electricity generation is delivered by rail. However, those deliveries fell in 2012 because of lower demand from power plant operators, who turned to more price-competitive natural gas as a generating fuel. Coal accounted for 37.2% of U.S. electricity generation through November 2012, based on the latest data from EIA's Electric Power Monthly. That level is down from 42.5% during the same 11-month period in 2011. Electricity generation from natural gas increased from 24.6% to 30.8% over the same time.
Net railcar loadings for other nonenergy commodities grew slightly in 2012. Railcar loads of motor vehicles and crushed stone rose the most among nonenergy commodities, while grain and metallic ores saw the largest carload declines for nonenergy commodities. Excluding coal, U.S. railcar loads totaled 8.7 million in 2012, up 3% from the previous year, according to AAR.
At this point, the admainstration's "war on coal" is largely irrelevant (not that I am in favor or it,mind you). Coal simply is not competitive vs. a vs. natural gas for the generation of electricity.
You are comparing different commodities here on volume... pricing and the market have everything to do with unit trainloadings for coal. If power plants are moving to DIRT CHEAP natural gas... you would see less coal use, right?
I did not see that is misleading. I saw it as confirming that point.
Energy regulations effect more than just the energy market. It can drive other markets both up and down.
I believe that coal is still cheaper per raw BTU than Natural Gas. It is the regulations on coal that continue to add up greater cost in using it to produce electricity.
delivered coal price will average $2.40 per MMBtu in 2012
United States Natural Gas Industrial Price
~3.59 per MMBtu
Of course coal varies a lot in quality, so the number above is the average paid.
Yeah, but there is a whole lot more than "raw BTU" involved. Sure, regulations are part of it, but I suspect that natgas is also more efficient (combined cycle gas turbine/steam turbine), transport by pipeline rather than rail, and probably others.
If I remember correctly, modern coal plants spend nearly 1/3 of the power they generate to reach the environmental requirements of the EPA with scrubbers and the like.
Interesting. I had not heard that statistic. I don't doubt it, though.
The 1/3 might be only for high-sulfur coal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.