To: HomeAtLast; Bubba_Leroy
The article says that the grave was found 2,231 feet below ground level. That is awfully deep. That can’t be right, can it? I suspect excessivly precise Euroish to British conversion
0.68 metres=2.231 feet
Which looks about right from the in situ photo
30 posted on
02/04/2013 10:31:49 AM PST by
Oztrich Boy
(I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
To: Oztrich Boy
Right, the article said it was only 27 inches below ground level.
31 posted on
02/04/2013 10:50:09 AM PST by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson