Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China offers Type 054 to meet Thai frigate requirement
IHS Jane's ^ | 1/30/2013 | Jon Grevatt

Posted on 02/03/2013 9:39:25 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

China offers Type 054 to meet Thai frigate requirement

By Jon Grevatt

1/30/2013

China has offered Thailand its Type 054-class Jiangkai frigate to meet a requirement to procure multipurpose frigates for the Royal Thai Navy (RTN), thus potentially putting Beijing and Washington head to head in a large-scale international procurement programme.

Sources have confirmed to IHS Jane's that preliminary discussions between Thailand and China have commenced over the potential deal, in which China has said it is prepared to sell to the RTN three Type 054-class vessels at a cost that will meet the programme's budget of USD1 billion.

While the RTN is said to favour a purchase of a US, European, or South Korean platform, the potential deal to procure from China is being led by the government, which views the Type 054-class as a cost-effective alternative to Western vessels. Additionally, logistical arrangements would favour China given that Thailand already operates a number of Chinese naval platforms.

Lockheed Martin of the US has already confirmed that it is considering offering its Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) as a solution.

A deal to procure the Type 054-class vessel would include technology transfer to enable maintenance, repair, and overhaul

(Excerpt) Read more at janes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; frigate; lockheedmartin; thailand

1 posted on 02/03/2013 9:39:37 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I dunno, it’s probably made of chrome painted rice paper.


2 posted on 02/03/2013 9:46:54 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Clinton sell them the blueprints?


3 posted on 02/03/2013 10:13:31 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Makes our new littoral “combat” ships look like a joke. But heck, a WWII USN destroyer already does that too.


4 posted on 02/03/2013 10:46:58 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

And just where the frilly heck would Clinton get the blueprints?


5 posted on 02/03/2013 10:56:04 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

6 posted on 02/03/2013 11:11:40 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

12.5 foot draft. 36.6 knots. 5000 mile cruise range. Four 5 inch turret mounted guns. Torpedoes, depth charges. Festooned with 40mm and 20mm.

A Fletcher class destroyer, built to WWII specs could utterly slaughter the Littoral “Combat” ships. Updated it would be an embarrassment. The new ship carries the Griffin missile. (a whopping 13 lb warhead. The weak love child of a Hellfire and an 82mm mortar. 12 mile range!) It also has a single HUGE 2.2inch gun. In short, it’s almost unable to defend itself on the surface, and has no defense at all against subs.

It it supposed to operate close to shore, but has a 13 foot draft as opposed to the Fletcher at 12.5 ft. Also close to shore is very dangerous for the Littoral. A single tank ashore could kick it’s butt. But if it dared shoot at a Fletcher, it would be slaughtered by the four 5 inch turrets at 15 rounds a minute,,each. The Littoral could shoot it’s 57mm, try a Griffin, or run for it’s life. But it better run. A single 120mm tank round could destroy a littoral.
Why? Because Littorals were actually exempted from the ability to absorb battle damage requirements.

Silly ships, built to please contractors and procurement admirals. While our enemies build warships.


7 posted on 02/03/2013 11:47:05 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Have to ask Vince Foster, when I hear back, I’ll let you know what he says.


8 posted on 02/04/2013 12:06:26 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
The new ship carries the Griffin missile. (a whopping 13 lb warhead. The weak love child of a Hellfire and an 82mm mortar. 12 mile range!)

Only if you can get the LCS up to 30,000ft altitude. Surface launch it's 3(and a half)miles.

9 posted on 02/04/2013 12:15:25 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Thin hull cracks so easily it would make a spectacular target, LCS is little more than that.


10 posted on 02/04/2013 6:08:22 AM PST by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Thin hull cracks so easily it would make a spectacular target, LCS is little more than that.


11 posted on 02/04/2013 6:08:22 AM PST by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Makes our new littoral “combat” ships look like a joke.

Functionally it comes out equivilent to a Perry FFG: only one helo, but more extensive radar, stealth, twin shaft diesel powerplant.

12 posted on 02/04/2013 3:40:22 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson