The author seems to assume that collectivists come to a point where they will quit advancing their endgame.
We are far from arriving at their endgame. They will be constantly pushing on the next thing.
“The author seems to assume that collectivists come to a point where they will quit advancing their endgame.”
I agree. If there will always be groups that reject ‘gay marriage’, the state will always be there to punish them when they reject whatever impossibility the state is calling marriage at the time. I just don’t see them putting down that whip. They would only put it down if everyone eventually accepts ‘gay marriage’, and for many religious groups this will never happen.
The major reason ‘gay marriage’ is such an issue is because the state has the ability to punish those who disagree with the definition it uses to recognize the institution.
Freegards