To: ctdonath2
Seems the author was all but saying “bring on a case overturning 922(o) already, it’s a slam dunk”. You mean like U.S. vs. Rock Island Armory (HTML, EPUB)? or U.S. vs. Dalton (HTML, EPUB)? Both struck down 922(o) in their entirety.
10 posted on
02/01/2013 6:41:26 AM PST by
zeugma
(Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
To: zeugma
Those didn’t invalidate 922(o), they ruled people couldn’t be punished for not registering under NFA when BATFE refused to accept registration under NFA because 922(o) prohibited possession.
11 posted on
02/01/2013 1:15:49 PM PST by
ctdonath2
(End of debate. Your move.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson