To: Nachum
The feinstein ban is a smokescreen; They want it and would love to get it, but they're introducing so much radical legislation, that they're planning on their usual trick (which they call a "compromise" - which is nothing of the sort) Well we'll give up the ban, but surely you won't object to closing the "gun show loophole" (which is also nothing of the sort) which is just as dangerous BECAUSE IT AMOUNTS TO CLANDESTINE GUN REGISTRATION.
GUN REGISTRATION has long been the wet dream of every liberal freedom hater out there. And if "strengthening the checks" as they call it, goes through they will have gun registration.
21 posted on
01/30/2013 10:32:30 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: from occupied ga
"The feinstein ban is a smokescreen; They want it and would love to get it, but they're introducing so much radical legislation, that they're planning on their usual trick (which they call a "compromise" - which is nothing of the sort) Well we'll give up the ban, but surely you won't object to closing the "gun show loophole" (which is also nothing of the sort) which is just as dangerous BECAUSE IT AMOUNTS TO CLANDESTINE GUN REGISTRATION. GUN REGISTRATION has long been the wet dream of every liberal freedom hater out there. And if "strengthening the checks" as they call it, goes through they will have gun registration."
This is exactly what should be expected. Registration is always a prelude to confiscation. This would be accomplished through taking advantage of another false flag event, such as a mass shooting or an event involving "Al-Qaeda" or some such. The feds and military are clearly gearing up for something--something big. This looks like a victory to our side until an analysis is conducted.
33 posted on
01/31/2013 5:45:26 AM PST by
ronnyquest
(I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of freedom only to see marxism elected at home.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson