Say what you want. Romney still lost because he did not motivate the conservative base.
You two act like whoever the old bastards in the GOP old boy’s club annoint as a candidate has a right to my vote. Sorry, no.
I know this upsets you and that’s probably why so many millions of conservatives are silent. Myself, I really don’t care if I offend you with the truth anymore than I care if I offend liberals with the truth.
I’m saying that in 2016 the GOP needs a candidate who can motivate the conservative base and you two seem to be of a mind that the GOP can put up another milquetoast RINO if they want. Bitch, whine, and complain all you want, I won’t vote for whoever that loser is, either.
The solution here is simple, give people like me a candidate we can support and we will.
On topic is the call Rush Limbaugh got from a caller with his response:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2983608/posts
“CALLER: ...The Republicans didn’t lose because of Hispanics. The Republicans lost because they’re not conservative enough.
RUSH: I happen to think you’re dead right. I think that’s why so many voters, Republicans who did vote in 2008, didn’t in 2012. I think that’s why”
Dude, it boils down to this:
You are happier with Obama in office than Romney.
That says a lot about how stubborn you are.
And no, I’m not coming from the establishment GOP. I’m more Libertarian.
you said: -—”Romney still lost because he did not motivate the conservative base.”
No, Romney lost because some stubborn conservatives didn’t vote AGAINST Obunga. Very very short-sighted. Look where we are now and where we will be in the next 4 years. This isn’t an experiment. This is real life.
Romney didn’t need to motivate the conservative base when the choice between him and a fascist Marxist was clear.
I blame “useful fools” such as yourself for not preventing this. Granted, Romney wasn’t ideal, but you could have voted against Obunga but you didn’t. Shame shame shame on you.