Replies

I don't recall anyone issuing subpoena for a CLN or Obama's Certificate of Naturalization. For that matter, it's Obama's Certificate of Naturalization that automatically disqualifies him from the Presidency. Forged IDs, a fake Selective Service registration and a fake SSN are an important part of the ineligibilty equation, but they aren't automatic disqualifiers.

It's unfortunate so many have convinced a few only certified and corroborated evidence must be presented before a complaint can be filed and heard. As I understand it, a complaint with allegations is filed with the Court and the defendents are noticed. The complaint will offer support for the allegations by citing laws, regulations and legal precedent which supports the theory the plaintiff(s) has(have) suffered an injury due to the actions of the defendant(s). And finally, the complaint must propose a theory the Court has jurisdiction.

If the complaint survives a motion to dismiss, motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; the defendent(s) must file an answer or suffer a default judgement. At this point, subpoenas can be issued. You can waste time auditing HDOH vital records, or his SS-5 and his selective service files, but his Certificate of Naturalization is the disqualifier.

The only time a case on Obama's eligibility went to trial was the administrative hearing in Georgia and Orly proposed to adjudicate the case with her experts and their theories after the Court clearly put the burden of proof on Obama. When Orly mentioned Obama's Indonesian citizenship, the Judge cut her off as presenting something irrelevant.

And here we are. The burden is on Obama to waive his Privacy Rights to expose his immigration record with his Certificate of Naturalization and FReepers are demanding I expose Obama's ineligibilty documents even though it is against the law to do so. And you're right, it is against the law to encourage, conspire or demand others break the law for the good of the cause.

That court did NOT put any burden of proof on Obama. It certainly refused a motion to quash Orly's subpoena's, but no burden of proof was ever put on Obama. The court assumed that burden on his behalf by saying it "considered" that Obama was born in Hawaii.

Sven...come on man. What's the deal?

Let's play the game.

Let's assume that a CLN exists for Barry.

So What?

Tell us Sven, specifically:

Who would have standing to bring a case to court to compel the court to order the release of such alleged CLN?
What court would have jurisdiction over such a case?

And, do you base your answers to above on your opinion, or fact/statute law? If the later, please cite.