If I didn’t know CBS was a responsible and respected news outlet I’d suspect they were taunting us.
The constitution has an amendment provision. If the profession thinks we are better off without certain provisions of the document then he is welcome to try and convince enough to amend it.
Well its not like they don’t all know the guy is ineligible. I’m sure every one of our illustrious 535 elected legislators and 9 Supreme Court Justices also know it.
What’s matter now???
It's not surprising that a law professor from an elitist establishment university is anti-American. These elitists hold a view that is more popular and mainstream with every passing election. I'm sure he believes the Constitution is impeding Obama's needed "progress".
The very facts of BHO's presidency are themselves the greatest argument in favor of requiring loyalty as a condition of presidential candidacy. But now what? If we as a nation are willing to overlook one inconvenient part of the Constitution, then why isn't it acceptable to overlook other unpopular provisions? Their boldness to make such a treasonous appeal is bolstered by the current gun debate.
Our weak Republican leaders are grooming a non-NBC candidate of their own for the office -- neither of his parents were citizens at the time of his birth. Now he's advancing "immigration reform". You know who he is.
Oops, my post was not meant for you specifically, but for ALL.
They know - of course - that the bat-eared-b*stard quota baby dork was not born here.
Of course, the law is only for little people.
Until one day, the little people figure it out, read the 2nd amendment, and......
There you go...the media know he’s not legit. The truth will come out probably after he leaves office in 2017. However, they avoid all discussion of crimes that have been committed associated with the illegal use of multiple SSN’s.