Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganator

The root of the “spontaneous” lie can be traced all the way back to the dems spin after the 1st WTC bombing.

The dems spin after the attack was the attack was because Bush had sent troops into Somalia in 1992 which outraged the muslims.

In reality the attack was planned in 1991 after the R King beating video surfaced. What a coincidence, hyped outrage by the news media after a video.

The dems spin after the attack was to try and make it appear as if the planning phase of the attack was much shorter than it actually was, sort of spontaneous.


12 posted on 01/27/2013 7:59:47 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IMR 4350

There was NOTHING “spontaneous” about the lie of Benghazi. One of the Obama campaign points was that Al Qaeda was defeated.

It is a fair speculation to think that the Obama campaign did not want a terrorist attack less than 2 months before the election. It happened anyway. Obama wanting to keep it on the down low neglected his Presidential duty and did not give the “go ahead” to the military who were aware and standing by. Four Americans lost their lives, Obama and his campaign did not want the American voters to know this was an Al Qaeda terrorist attack. Obama ordered the lie.


15 posted on 01/27/2013 8:08:30 AM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson