I’m not sure I disagree with him on that point. I’m a moderator on a popular hunting site and FAR more hunters than I would expect have that “You don’t need” attitude.
Some hunters, like other groups, don’t care about bans until/unless it about THIER preferred weapon and they are slow to aid causes or write their representatives on issue that don’t effect them directly.
It’s infuriating and extremely short sighted.
But then I was amazed to learn a few of them voted for Obama in the first place.
Why do we keep calling them weapons? They are guns until they are aimed at someone. Then it is a weapon. Maybe using the right terminology will change some peoples idea of a gun.