Posted on 01/24/2013 6:33:07 AM PST by SeekAndFind
My posts are the arguments they will use to justify women in combat. We all know about the physical differences and the lowering of standards. I am against the policy myself.
Once they make up their minds about something they will use all of these to sway public opinion. Reality in combat is a different story.
None of these new technologies are in production, they just have prototypes.
No they aren’t, they are just silly and repetitive.
OK. Lets re-engage in 2015 then.
I don’t know what that post was about either.
What an Army - from macho to queer with the stroke of a pen - now it’s lesbians take the point
What an Army - from macho to queer with the stroke of a pen - now it’s lesbians take the point
What an Army - from macho to queer with the stroke of a pen - now it’s lesbians take the point
Robert Heinlein - 1973
Notebooks of Lazarus Long
from
“TIME ENOUGH FOR LOVE”
“All societies are based on rules to protect pregnant women and young children. All else is surplus age, excrescence, adornment, luxury or folly which can—and must—be dumped in emergency to preserve this prime function. As racial survival is the only universal morality, no other basic is possible. Attempts to formulate a “perfect society” on any foundation other than “women and children first!” is not only witless, it is automatically genocidal. Nevertheless, starry-eyed idealists (all of them male) have tried endlessly—and no doubt will keep on trying.”
My last comment meant we will have this discussion again in 2015. This is when “women in combat” will be implemented if it is approved.
Yet another weird post that doesn’t make sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.