To: kiryandil
I suspect this is just a matter of liability. Insurance companies end up holding the bag and defending their policy holders when they are sued. It would seem GEICO is choosing which liabilities not to be exposed to, which is their business.
28 posted on
01/23/2013 6:13:42 PM PST by
aMorePerfectUnion
(Gone rogue, gone Galt, gone international. Gone Independent. Gone.)
To: aMorePerfectUnion
It is for his AUTO insurance. How does that relate to his business in gun parts? How is that even their business? Here's hoping he has grounds to sue their sorry hides.
Is geico going to refuse insurance to gang members or mobsters because their cars might get shot full of holes?
85 posted on
01/23/2013 7:20:23 PM PST by
cyn
(Benghazi... the TRAVESTY continues)
To: aMorePerfectUnion
I suspect this is just a matter of liability. Insurance companies end up holding the bag and defending their policy holders when they are sued. It would seem GEICO is choosing which liabilities not to be exposed to, which is their business. Geico is a private company and is fully entitled to do just that. However, if this story is true, then we are also fully entitled to boycott that company forever. A company that is putting my fundamental human rights at risk is a liability I choose not to be exposed to. That is my business.
To: aMorePerfectUnion
How you drive your car should hve absolutely no connection to what you do for a living.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson