Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie
The reality was that the choice was between Romney and Obama--no brainer. Romney was far more acceptable than Obama. We must start living in reality.

I'll ask you the same question, what Republicans will you find acceptable to vote for for president? Remember, be realistic.

75 posted on 01/24/2013 4:33:24 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Conservativegreatgrandma; SoConPubbie
"We have to do a better job of explaining and demonstrating why our ideas are better" on such issues as fighting poverty and helping people move up "the ladder of life," Ryan said.

Ryan is partially right about the failure to communicate idea. He and Romney did not articulate the conservative position very well at all. Personally, the more Ryan appeared, the more I didn't think his communication style was effective. The larger issues, though, are quality of communication, and Ryan is right about that.

The elephant in the room, though, about communication is that the Republicans are seriously outgunned when it comes to getting their message out. Outside of Fox, talk radio, and conservative blogs, the republicans CANNOT get their message out. The liberal party owns 9/10ths of broadcast and cable media, just as much or more of the internet, nearly 100% of Hollywood, cinema, comedy, entertainment TV, TV talk shows, sitcoms, soaps, sports broadcasters, printing companies, and in-print authors.

Americans hear 25 liberal messages for any 1 conservative message. The American media has successfully locked out the conservative message from getting heard by the average American. They are in the process of doing the same with every subject imaginable from the budget battles to the discussion of abortion.

So, even if both Ryan and Romney had been absolutely pristine perfect in every communication they ever made, they still wouldn't have gotten that message to America in any kind of timely way.

So far as turnout is concerned, many bemoan the conservatives who stayed home. They is Romney's responsibility. He turned them off with his comments about gay adoption, gay couples, gay military, health of mother abortion, bi-partisan gun legislation, "revenue" enhancement, and silence on major foreign policy disasters such as Benghazi, the Arab Spring, and budgetary waste, fraud, and abuse, particularly the 300 billion dollar annual interest payment on debt.

Romney alienated values voters the most, and that was because he was intentionally dropping hints in an effort to attract moderate liberals away from the Dem Party. Why, though, would these vote for a closet liberal when they could have the real thing? So, Romney failed in attracting them at all and in the process he lost many social conservatives.

What should future conservative campaigns look like?

First, conservatives need to gain control of more media power.

Second, conservatives must run conservatives campaigns, talk proudly of conservative issues, and BELIEVE in their conservative take on the world.

76 posted on 01/24/2013 6:09:36 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma; xzins
The reality was that the choice was between Romney and Obama--no brainer. Romney was far more acceptable than Obama. We must start living in reality.

The reality is, that as a conservative Christian, I cannot vote for someone who is purposefully taking stands against God's laws, under any circumstances. To do so would harm my relationship with God and that is the most important thing to a Christian, or should be.

I'll ask you the same question, what Republicans will you find acceptable to vote for for president? Remember, be realistic.

Anybody who is both a fiscal AND social conservative. Otherwise, I vote third party.

And I'd bet that a lot of conservatives, a lot more than in 2012, are now in that boat as well. The GOP better get it's house in order if it expects to win another Presidential election.
92 posted on 01/24/2013 7:09:41 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson