Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
The republicans should have [run] a pro-life candidate, it would help to distinguish the two major parties.

What, you mean like a pro-life woman who walks her talk? Karl Rove forbids it! < /s >

16 posted on 01/22/2013 12:42:01 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus

What, you mean like a pro-life woman who walks her talk? Karl Rove forbids it!

...if by that you mean Palin, then Obama would have garnered 347 EC’s, and won by 6 or 7 percent of the electorate...it may in fact have distinguished the parties, but would be regressive in helping Repubs win...and ditto for Newt, as well...it’s clear that Romney won over middle of the road voters, in whose minds Palin or Gingrich represent harshness and confrontation, thus rendering them unfit...remember, women that Mitt won over aren’t all warm and fuzzy about Newt, and Palin turns a lot of them off as well
...under those circumstances, any votes against Obama have even less meaning that in the last election, as the verdict would be evident at the start...


23 posted on 01/23/2013 1:16:25 PM PST by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson