Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

His logic is based on his own girth. That is, if everyone was as obese as he was and presented as large a target as he is, then of course only 2-4 bullets would be required to hit the target.

Noodler probably never fired a gun.

1 posted on 01/19/2013 7:13:31 AM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: IbJensen
Cops which are supposedly trained to shoot and have been know to shoot 50 rounds without hitting the perp.
2 posted on 01/19/2013 7:16:49 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

I don’t know—it may take a bazooka to make more than a flesh wound in this guy..........


3 posted on 01/19/2013 7:18:20 AM PST by basil (basil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Great! Let’s start out by limiting police officers to guns with 3 rounds only. Right in the middle of his allowable range. More than that shouldn’t be ever be necessary. After all, the criminals the police have to confront are the very same ones victimizing the rest of us.


4 posted on 01/19/2013 7:19:21 AM PST by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

He’s obviously never seen me shoot.


5 posted on 01/19/2013 7:19:57 AM PST by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
i guess when you have cholesterol instead of blood running through yer veins like the Waddler, brain functions cease...
6 posted on 01/19/2013 7:23:28 AM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

What a retarded statist puke!


7 posted on 01/19/2013 7:26:35 AM PST by Thorliveshere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Fat and stupid is no way to go through life.


8 posted on 01/19/2013 7:28:53 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

For Nadler, I’d say a couple 30-round mags would be needed just to get through the blubber.

That, or a good elephant gun.


9 posted on 01/19/2013 7:31:42 AM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Surely, he is talking about AFTER the perp is downed.

Oldplayer


12 posted on 01/19/2013 7:35:17 AM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
It seems as though a large percentage of New Yorkers believe that they exist to tell other people what to do.

Put one of these creeps in the middle of a desert and he will immediately begin telling the lizards how to catch bugs.

13 posted on 01/19/2013 7:38:07 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

May this jackass never have to implement his theories.


15 posted on 01/19/2013 7:46:08 AM PST by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
‘My Wife Is a Hero’: Georgia Mother Shoots Home Intruder Five Times After Being Cornered in Attic

Exceprt:

“The perpetrator opens that door. Of course, at that time he’s staring at her, her two children and a .38 revolver,” [Walton County Sheriff Joe Chapman] told Channel 2’s Kerry Kavanaugh.

The woman then shot him five times, but he survived, Chapman said. He said the woman ran out of bullets but threatened to shoot the intruder if he moved.

“She’s standing over him, and she realizes she’s fired all six rounds. And the guy’s telling her to quit shooting,” Chapman said.


17 posted on 01/19/2013 7:48:55 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

2 - 4 Shots from most semi-automatic handguns probably wouldn’t bring his fat ass down, especially if he’s moving toward you!


18 posted on 01/19/2013 7:51:42 AM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Well placed per perp, maybe.

Jerrhole should concentrate on passing a law that only one person may commit a crime at a time. Then, a defensive posture would not require more rounds.


19 posted on 01/19/2013 7:54:25 AM PST by depressed in 06 (America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

There are over 8,000 home invasions each year with an average of 2-3 criminals taking part. 2-4 bullets would only work for a trained SEAL and he would probably still prefer more. Reducing the number of bullets could be called the Rapist Protection Act as it does nothing to protect the victim.


20 posted on 01/19/2013 7:54:38 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
He should limit his protection to one man with 2-4 bullits.
22 posted on 01/19/2013 7:56:37 AM PST by 20yearvet (they yell for more tests as long as its your money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

100% FACT: In just the first 5 Amendments, it is perfectly clear that the founders wanted the citizens protected from GOVERNMENT, not rabid deer.

100% FACT: For the 2nd Amendment to have ANY worth, the citizens MUST have, at bare minimum, the same arms that the government would be willing to use against them.

100% FACT: With the very first law/regulation on the citizen’s RTKBA the 2nd Amendment was rendered moot. Both sides of the debate never seem to get to the “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” portion which for an honest person would end any debate on the subject. They have INFRINGED therefore the Federal and state governments are currently in direct violation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. There is no honest way around this point.

100% FACT: The first time speech was limited the 1st Amendment was rendered moot. Yes you can yell fire in a theater but if it is not on fire then you are responsible for any injury.

100% FACT: The 4th Amendment is completely worthless with government being allowed to search you without a warrant.

100% FACT: The 5th Amendment is being dismantled in many areas like forced traffic stops/inspections where you are essentially forced into acts which can and will be used against you.

The only one of the first 5 Amendments which is not currently under attack is the 3rd but with the others gone, who cares?

And before anyone attempts to attack the point on traffic stops by saying “well a right to drive is not in the Constitution”, I say, thank you communist union teachers for making us so Constitutionally ignorant. WE HAVE ALL CREATOR GIVEN RIGHTS except for those which the Founders agreed to assign to the Federal government and the citizens of individual states decided to assign to their state government.

If you want to look into the constitution for rights given to you by the government then you need to read the constitution for the former Soviet Union as it was they not the USA which gave government the power to assign rights.


23 posted on 01/19/2013 8:05:18 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
"If you’re defending yourself against a robber… two or three or four shots should be enough—period.”

What a stupid a-hole -- period.

24 posted on 01/19/2013 8:08:44 AM PST by hummingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

I have some pet pointers about neurosurgical technique, 5-tone compositional scoring and particle accelerator design I’d like to share when fatass Nadler frees up the floor. Let me know if anyone sees any fat-quakes toward the door.


25 posted on 01/19/2013 8:09:47 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Just stepping back and using common sense here, my guess is the number of bullets that are enough “self-defense shots” is equal to the number of shots fired that results in the assailant being rendered incapable of posing a threat which requires self-defense.

Or am I missing something?


26 posted on 01/19/2013 8:10:52 AM PST by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson