Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tzimisce

We wouldn’t have that problem if we hadn’t been foolish enough to ratify the 17th Amendment.


18 posted on 01/18/2013 2:14:04 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

Repealing that bit of progressive stupidity should be a long term GOP goal. Its ridiculous that so many conservative leaning states have liberal senators who have zero interest in representing their states.


20 posted on 01/18/2013 2:26:34 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
Rep Todd Akin on May 26th 2012 concerning the 17th Amendment......

Calling himself a “strong conservative,” Akin said he has “a very serious concern about erosion of states’ rights and reversing this decision might pull that balance back.”

Akin’s two main rivals in the GOP race — John Brunner and Sarah Steelman — said that while they agreed too much power has migrated to the federal government, they were in favor of keeping the 17th Amendment in place.

Supporters say the amendment reduces corruption by reducing the influence of state legislators and gives more power to the public. Opponents say allowing legislatures to pick senators would make them more accountable to their states and reduce the number of unfunded mandates handed down by Congress.

26 posted on 01/18/2013 3:12:30 PM PST by Evil Slayer ((Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson