I’d settle for eying a viable conservative candidate.
All I know is that in the People’s Repubic of Maryland O’Mally and the Democrats voted not to proportion the electoral vote and they are certainly Democrats.
Of course with AP we know whose side they are on.
The writing in this article is so bad no one can understand it, but what I believe upsets the Democrats is that they want all electoral votes in Democrat States to go for them, but they want proportion in Mixed states that could go majority Republican.
Of course they want to blame this on Republicans.
They want to blame everything on Republicans.
One day they will wake up and blame Obama on Republicans.
I’d settle for closed primaries. A little peace of mind on that point has become more and more appreciated.
The RNC Rule changes need to be understood, as grassroot conservatives seem to be more and more marginalized at convention.
Definite hat tip to Libertarians who stood up and fought the Establishment surrogates on some of these state and national committees.
“I’d settle for eying a viable conservative candidate.”
It doesn’t make any difference who the candidates are as long as the left controls elections and is allowed voting “irregularities” as they see fit. The Supreme Court, earlier this week, left in place a ruling from 1982 that disallows Republicans from challenging ANY voter fraud on the part of democrats.