Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: South40
I've read the whole thread up to this post (54 replies). It is a pretty sad commentary for FR. The subject is Chris Christie's opinion on the NRA ad, which he is labeling as "reprehensive." The comments should be about agreeing with his opinion or disagreeing with it. But that's not what we got here ... we dig get a bunch of "DU" responses calling him pig, Nazi, Fat, Commie, yada yada yada. If name-calling becomes your "intellectual response" ... then we here on "our" side of today's issues have a problem as we are no different than the "intelligence level" (low information voter?)of our opposition. Anybody can call Christie a name, how many can give an intelligent disagreeing answer to his opinion? It seems not many at FR.

If you want to call Cristie names, go over to DU and do it there ... we already dislike his ideas here, so "name calling" is not going to influence us. The only influence that has is upon our opposition who revel that we are also becoming "name-calling low information voters" who cannot use IDEAS to win an argument.

Shame on most of you here!

56 posted on 01/18/2013 6:30:30 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag (...and to the Republic for which it STOOD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThePatriotsFlag

You can always leave if you feel unwelcome.


57 posted on 01/18/2013 6:41:32 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

I am certainly among those who made fun of Governor Christie.

And yes, I must confess that I did depart from my usual standards of civil debate.

Let me put it another way: As a conservative, I am offended by Christie’s remarks. I don’t necessarily agree with every position of the NRA. Nor am I a member. But Christie needs to decide whether he’s a Republican and a conservative, or a Democrat and a leftist.

When the NRA finally said something after Newtown, their proposal was to add armed guards in schools. There may have been other proposals they could make, but I hardly think they deserved the beating that they took from the media and others. Their ad was, in part, a response to that.

I have seen the ad, and it’s true. Obama’s kids attend a school with (I am told) 11 armed guards. Yet he and the other liberal elitists (some of whom sent their kids to that same school, or to other schools that also have armed guards) still seem to act as if the NRA is “insane” for proposing such a ridiculous idea.

I find nothing “reprehensive” about the NRA’s ad. On the contrary, I think it’s Mr. Christie who is deserving of that label.


60 posted on 01/18/2013 11:32:36 AM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson