[newgeezer]

[your doctor is] not a law enforcement official

Not so fast.

In 1998:

... the Supreme Court ruled that a single false statement to a federal agent, including a simple "no" to an accusation, can be punished as a crime.

The law makes it a crime to utter "any false statement" to a federal agent, and "the word 'no' in response to a question assuredly makes a 'statement,'" said Justice Antonin Scalia for the 7-2 majority.

(excerpt from The Los Angeles Times)

I'd like to think you're correct. But, I don't know how the law is worded and, technically, anyone acting with the authority of the federal government could be considered a "federal agent."

These are perilous times. Those who favor dismantling (rather than repealing) the Second Amendment would be wise to consider that, in doing so, they’re inviting similar unlawful erosion of our First and Fourth Amendment rights in the foreseeable future. If they think that can’t happen, they don’t know human nature, history, and why the Bill of Rights was ratified in the first place.

[Paladin2]

Don't talk to the PoPos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

[Ancesthntr]

Thanks for your concern, but I believe that to be a “federal agent” one must be employed by the feds, or be a contractor for the feds. Someone who simply reports information to them - like an accountant or a doctor - is not a federal agent. If so, then every employer in the country would be a federal agent by dint of reporting their employees’ wages to the IRS.

Anyhow, I will not disclose the ownership of any item of my property to any person who does not have a need to know - with ME being the person who determines the “need to know.”