[Baynative]

Bike Ping

"Could it be his particular cancer was caused by his choice of performance enhancing steroids/drugs??"

Now that's question I've never heard.

[Vision]

"Could it be his particular cancer was caused by his choice of performance enhancing steroids/drugs??"

No, Lance didn't start doping until they started racing in Europe and wanted to keep up- long after the cancer comeback.

[CharlesWayneCT]

But he wasn’t a great biker before the cancer, so if he was really better because of drugs, then it seems clear he started after the cancer.

Anyway, I’m surprised he admitted it, because I figured if he was a cheater, he also wouldn’t be able to come clean. So he surprises me a little.

Now the question is, if he was so easily able to win the tour, getting tested all the time, and not get caught, is there any reason to believe ANY of the drug testing done for the tour has been any use at all?

I’m guessing not. They all could have been drugged the way Lance says he was.

Unless Lance just is the best (at cheating).

[petro45acp]

Words fail

[EnquiringMind]

A Google search of steroids + testicular cancer will show articles from 2006 all the way up to present, linking (suspecting) Lance Armstrong’s cancer to his use of steroids.

No doubt in MY mind.