Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Housing market - hurt or help???
1 posted on 01/10/2013 9:48:00 AM PST by illiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: illiac

!


2 posted on 01/10/2013 9:52:29 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,spend it all today;who can take your income,tax it all away..0'Bozo man can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

I had a strange experience two weeks ago while trying to refinance our mortgage. Credit scores were very high and not a problem, but the appraisal came in very low. Sales in our neighborhood have been from repo houses and thus very low.
We wanted to ask the apraiser if he’d considered a few energy and ADA updates we had installed in our house. Our banker said that we couldn’t question the appraisal, that we would be fined as would she.

I’ve never heard of the consumer being fined for asking questions of an appraiser that the consumer paid to do an appraisal.

Does anyone know anything about this?


3 posted on 01/10/2013 9:53:52 AM PST by jayrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac
Housing market - hurt or help???

Constitution - hurt.

Federalism - hurt.

Increasing size of "federal" power via non-legislative fiat-driven agencies - Augments even further.

4 posted on 01/10/2013 9:55:30 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

Call me crazy, but didn’t banks have all these guidelines in place before the creation of this useless new federal agency? Didn’t the Community Reinvestment Act remove these guidelines?


6 posted on 01/10/2013 9:59:58 AM PST by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

I’m not seeing anything unreasonable here but I think that 42% number is high.


7 posted on 01/10/2013 10:00:42 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

43%!? Holy cow! That’s on helluva upside limit!

When I bought my first house in 1989, my upside limit was 33% and I was a terrific risk.

Geez.

Stupid, stupid, stupid.


8 posted on 01/10/2013 10:01:43 AM PST by RexBeach (Mr. Obama Loves To Spend My $$$$$$$$$$$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

Help the no money down deal is what maade the mess and now one has to prove he can pay the mortgage.
Back to grid one prove your worth the loan,the free ride company is out of business.


12 posted on 01/10/2013 10:05:09 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

I know none of us like this agency or big nanny state government. However, the details themselves sound like long overdue common sense.


13 posted on 01/10/2013 10:06:37 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

Looks racist to me. Its all about having a job and be able to pay.


16 posted on 01/10/2013 10:12:31 AM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac
The Consumer Protection Financial Bureau issues this rule:

"Qualified mortgages will be given protection for the bank from lawsuits filed by troubled borrowers or buyers of mortgage-backed bonds."

Another crony capitalism back room deal. How are consumers protected by this? The new rules don't even use a reasonable Debt to Income (DTI) ratio to consider the loan "qualified". Also, how does this protect the secondary market, which banks rely on heavily to keep the gravy train tumbling along...?

17 posted on 01/10/2013 10:22:49 AM PST by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

The only problem I see is if someone doesn’t use credit cards and has no credit score. A person may have no debt, save money, and pay cash for everything but they won’t look good on paper because of the lack of a credit score. Then what?


20 posted on 01/10/2013 5:44:09 PM PST by sunshine state
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

Loan documents used to be fairly easy to fill out. Now they’re called loan packages because they’re so thick.

This will further injure the housing market, but that’s the purpose of regulations.


21 posted on 01/10/2013 6:47:32 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac
Also, the CFPB plans to make some borrowers exempt from the new rules, such as applicants looking to refinance out of subprime adjustable-rate mortgages or some mortgages issued by non-profits that target low-income home buyers.

The new rules will take effect Jan. 21. Lenders have a year to fully implement these rules.

23 posted on 01/10/2013 6:56:29 PM PST by Jane Long (Philippians 2:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson