Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cherokee1; All

“Guns have been nationally traceable to the first consumer sale since 1968. Unless there’s something else in this that is so far unstated it is just Obamuzzie giving more smoke enemas.”

It seems pretty clearly stated here:
“...track the movement and sale of weapons through a national database…”

Sounds like the outlawing of all private sales and establishment of a database of who legally owns weapons, essentialy the same as the failed Canadian gun registry.


103 posted on 01/06/2013 6:56:31 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Yes, and there is no evidence that even a single crime was prevented because of the multi-billion gun registry (which would likely be 20 times as costly in the US). The Canadian gun registry was born out of an incident in Quebec where a crazy old coot killed a police officer who came to his house on an investigation. The police knew he had guns but failed to take the proper precautions. Ignoring the facts, the governing Liberal party and the usual gaggle of leftist organizations used this as the rallying cry for the registration of all guns.

The reason that a gun registry does not work is two-fold. First, there are many people even in Canada who refused to register their guns, so reliance on the gun registry would give police officers a false sense of security. The police should always approach a situation on the assumption that one or more individuals may be armed. Second, it raises the risk of an excessive police response to what would otherwise be a routine call. If the police know you have a registered weapon, are they going to come to a noisy party complaint with their guns drawn? There was a tragedy in Canada some years ago (prior to the gun registry) where the police attempted a raid on a house which they believed contained weapons. They approached the house in the dark, wearing dark clothing, in an assault formation. The owner looked out and saw shadowy figures approaching his house, clearly armed, so he took out his own gun and went out on his front step to defend his property. He was shot and killed by the police. The problem? The police were at the wrong house. They should have been next door. If the police start using the ownership of guns as a pretence to treat the homeowner as a presumptive dangerous criminal, you will see more of this kind of incident.


105 posted on 01/07/2013 5:21:46 AM PST by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson