1 posted on
01/06/2013 11:02:12 AM PST by
ColdOne
To: ColdOne
I wonder if this could have been LAPD’s kickoff of a “Blunt Object” buyback program. Hammers, clubs, baseball bats, “rocket launchers”, etc.
3 posted on
01/06/2013 11:21:37 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Where can I pick up a 2013 Mayan calendar?)
To: ColdOne
Because “Police Seize Harmless Plastic Tubes” doesn’t sell newspapers or attract the web clicks which pay the presstitutes’ salaries.
4 posted on
01/06/2013 11:24:30 AM PST by
SpaceBar
To: ColdOne
So, in other words, it was an “assault weapon!”
5 posted on
01/06/2013 11:38:13 AM PST by
Procyon
(Decentralize, degovernmentalize, deregulate, demonopolize, decredentialize, disentitle.)
To: ColdOne
So somebody could buy a few of those scrap tubes for cheap and sell them to the LAPD who will gladly pay top dollar for plastic tubes...
6 posted on
01/06/2013 11:41:45 AM PST by
Mechanicos
(When did we amend the Constitution for a 2nd Federal Prohibition?)
To: ColdOne
There’s quite a bit of incorrect information around the Net about that overly expensive weapon. The extent of the confusion is a little funny, really. We live in a nation of mad civilian and REMF experts on everything combat.
9 posted on
01/06/2013 1:54:38 PM PST by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: ColdOne
But what about pointed sticks?!
10 posted on
01/06/2013 2:05:12 PM PST by
Redcloak
(CA conservatives: Go to https://rtv.sos.ca.gov/elections/register-to-vote/ to quit the GOP!)
To: ColdOne
Think one round and throw away bazooka.
14 posted on
01/06/2013 6:14:19 PM PST by
jwalsh07
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson