Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

” new information which legally indicates that Sotomayor is not eligible to be on SCOTUS”

_________________________________________________

I hadn’t heard that!

I’ve always appreciated your informed posts,butterdezillon. I’ll have to look into this.


59 posted on 01/06/2013 9:56:44 PM PST by proud American in Canada (Pray for America. And Happy New Year!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: proud American in Canada

The Hawaii registrar issued a certified letter of verification to AZ SOS Ken Bennett indirectly confirming that Obama has no legally-established birth facts (since the HI BC is legally non-valid). Without legally-established birth facts there is no way that Obama could ever “qualify” as required by the 20th Amendment in order to “act as President”. Given that Obama is now legally known to have “failed to qualify”, it is now known that only Joe Biden could nominate SCOTUS justices for the last 4 years. That means that both Sotomayor and Kagan cannot Constitutionally be SCOTUS justices, not having been nominated by someone Constitutionally qualified to nominate them.

To see how Onaka’s verification confirms that Obama has no legally-established birth facts, see http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf

Hobby Lobby is in a very critical position right now, which can be used for good if they are willing to speak the truth to power. If anybody knows an attorney who could look at this and help influence the Hobby Lobby attorneys to use this opportunity, please do whatever you can to help that happen.


71 posted on 01/07/2013 11:54:30 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson