It's not "nit-picking." It's after-action analysis, and if you don't understand the value of it, you don't need to be offering opinion to those of us who do....
I’m aware of that, but it’s like many are never satisfied. If someone is without a firearm and is hurt/killed/robbed, FR is “tsk, tsk, would’ve been fine with a gun”. Then she HAS a gun and the end result was good, but it’s not good enough. “Should’ve killed him, should’ve used shotgun, should’ve had good rounds.” Geesh. Carping.