Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux
Those who collect some form of outright welfare and today's version of unemployment compensation should not be able to vote. Those who are receiving a Social Security benefit, not having earned those benefits, should not be able to vote.

Two wolves and a lamb, etc,etc.

14 posted on 01/04/2013 10:04:31 AM PST by Banjoguy (The Mayor of San Antonio is the smoothest liar I have ever seen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Banjoguy

“-— and today’s version of unemployment compensation should not be able to vote.”

So my daughter,an MBA who had worked for over 25 years and was laid off and collected unemployment for about a year shouldn’t have been able to vote?

Ridiculous !

She is now working but the entire experience was very difficult for her.

.


24 posted on 01/04/2013 10:13:08 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Banjoguy

I call it “No representation without taxation”. That applies to those who dont pay.

Those who are recieving their sustenance from the government should be barred from voting while they are on the take. I need a nice phrase for that one...


26 posted on 01/04/2013 10:18:29 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson