Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Contraception mandate kicks in for wave of employers
cna ^ | January 3, 2013 | Michelle Bauman

Posted on 01/04/2013 6:31:10 AM PST by NYer

HHS Sec. Kathleen Sebelius listens as President Obama announces the contraceptive mandate at the White House, Jan. 12, 2012. Official White House Photo by Pete Souza.

Washington D.C., Jan 3, 2013 / 06:01 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The battle over religious freedom is intensifying as the controversial federal contraception mandate goes into effect for many for-profit employers at the start of the New Year.

“We shouldn’t have to give up our First Amendment rights to make a living,” said Maureen Ferguson, senior policy advisor for The Catholic Association, which seeks to bring a faithful Catholic voice to the public square.

Ferguson told CNA on Jan. 3 that employers who did not win a court order blocking the mandate are now “placed in a horrible position, choosing between their livelihood and their faith.”

On Jan. 1, 2013, new employee health insurance plans began for many companies throughout the U.S., causing the new federal contraception mandate to go into effect for them. The controversial mandate requires coverage of contraception – including drugs that may cause early abortions – and sterilization.

While the mandate includes a narrow exemption for some religious employers and a one-year delay with the promise of a revision for others, for-profit companies have not been offered any accommodation for religious liberty. The government maintains that the right to religious freedom does not extend to owners of secular businesses.

The mandate has prompted dozens of lawsuits from both for-profit and non-profit organizations asking for temporary injunctions to block the enforcement of the mandate while they argue their cases in court.

On Dec. 30, U.S. District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff granted an injunction to Tom Monaghan, the founder and former owner of Domino's Pizza who now owns the property management company for a Michigan office park.

The judge acknowledged that the mandate would place a “substantial burden” on Monaghan’s ability to freely exercise his Catholic religion and could cause him to suffer “irreparable harm.”

“It is in the best interest of the public that Monaghan not be compelled to act in conflict with his religious beliefs,” the judge ruled in granting the injunction shortly before the end of the year.

Other employers scored last-minute victories as well, including a Mennonite-owned wood manufacturing company in Pennsylvania and a dairy farming corporation in Missouri.

So far, 10 for-profit employers have received injunctions from the mandate, while three have been denied them. Those employers that were not granted injunctions can still argue their cases in court, but they may be subject to fines for violating the mandate during this process.

Grote Industries, an Indiana-based vehicle lighting manufacturer, is one of the companies that was denied its request for an injunction. However, attorney Matt Bowman said that the legal team representing the company “has asked the judge to reconsider her recent decision.”

He explained to CNA that the appeals court in the judge’s circuit “granted an injunction to another business the day after she denied Grote Industries’ request.”

Hobby Lobby, the family-owned arts and crafts retailer, was also denied an injunction by both a district and appeals court. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor turned down the company’s emergency injunction appeal on Dec. 26, removing hope of immediate relief from the high court.

However, Kyle Duncan, an attorney representing Hobby Lobby in its case, said that the company plans to continue providing health insurance to its employees without paying for the drugs that it finds morally objectionable.

To continue following their Christian beliefs, the company’s owners now risk fines of $1.3 million per day.

Ferguson said that the commitment shown by Hobby Lobby and its owners is “incredibly admirable.”

The company is “a true American success story,” started in a garage in Oklahoma, she explained, and Congress “ought to be paying attention” when a government regulation threatens the existence of such a business.

Still, Ferguson remains “cautiously optimistic” as the lawsuits continue to move forward, observing that it is “encouraging that we’re winning in most of the court cases.”

Prayer and efforts to educate others about the mandate are critical, she emphasized, urging the faithful to be active in their parishes, contact their congressional representatives and write letters to the editor to raise awareness and support for religious freedom.

The unprecedented encroachment posed the mandate could lead to a further erosion of fundamental freedoms unless people are willing to stand up now, Ferguson explained.

“Catholics should be gravely concerned about this,” she said.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: hhs; liberty; mandate; religion

1 posted on 01/04/2013 6:31:20 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; SumProVita; ...

Here's How!

2 posted on 01/04/2013 6:33:12 AM PST by NYer ("Before I formed you in the womb I knew you." --Jeremiah 1:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

For the last four years Obama&Co have worked on getting rid of two things livelihood and their faith.
MSM winks.

3 posted on 01/04/2013 6:58:11 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The ultimate goal of Obamacare is to crash the current health care system and rebuild it on the Single Payer model.

And if that Single Payer won’t pay for abortions, it would be the same thing as banning them, which the Left will never agree to.

Hence any victory on this is going to be pyrrhic and short-lived, IMHO.

4 posted on 01/04/2013 7:17:52 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

More DVT’s!!!!!!!!!!

5 posted on 01/04/2013 7:28:40 AM PST by hecht (america 9/11, Israel 24/7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I have talked with five people in the past week whose hours were cut to 29 or less effective on the first day of this year. Three were told that they would be fired immediately and without any chance of reversing the decision if they ever worked more than 29 hours in a single week, regardless of the reason. One manager (on the list of 42 full-time corporate employees) I know was told that he would be fired if he permitted any of his people who are not authorized to work full time to work more than 29 hours in a week.

6 posted on 01/04/2013 7:44:12 AM PST by Pollster1 (Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Can you share the name of this company? (so I will recognize it when the Obama Administration publishes their Official List of Unpatriotic Parasite Employers?)

7 posted on 01/04/2013 7:45:43 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson