So what? That doesn't mean they're not citizens. Gay people cannot marry in most places and until recently couldn't serve in the military--that doesn't mean they aren't citizens. And what do you mean by "no ownership rights"? My son's Xbox isn't really his, even though he bought it with his own money?
Technically a child born of a child can never achieve citizenship because they are not born of a citizen.
Like I said, do you have any support in law or precedence for that idea?
So you do not define citizenship as anything other than being a citizen. You have performed a perfect reductio ad absurdum, reducing your premise to meaninglesless.