He's right. A sturdy gallows and a nice rope would provide all the support a predator who harms children needs.
This is what next.
Purely Satanic influences. The amount of damage pedophiles do is immeasurable.
The only support they need is walking up the gallo steps.
Any freakin pedophile that puts his hands on my kids will receive 11 warnings to stop (more if I can reload), in .40.
He's right. A sturdy gallows and a nice rope would provide all the support a predator who harms children needs.
(Bailey said that while he also found the notion “disturbing”, he was forced to recognise that “persuasive evidence for the harmfulness of paedophilic relationships does not yet exist”.)
I beg to differ. Just ask the ten percent of the population that is homosexual if they were sexually abuse as a child.
This attitude is disgusting. Does he really think Pedophiles are going to out themselves so they can be held accountable? Hope he’s not holding his breath on that one.
Not exactly pedophilia but sick just the same.
Just today our local news reported that a local man had been arrested for having sex with his 18 year old daughter. The news said that he had been recently reunited with her after the mother won custody when she was a little girl.
Apparently mother knew best years ago.
Santorum warned us about this. What’s next? Zoophilia / bestiality.
Who are we to judge with our Judeo-Christian, hetero- and adult-centric prejudices?
This is just a logical extension of moral relativism: anything is permissible as long as you decide it is.
It wouldn’t surprise me to hear more so-called experts defend incest, bestiality, and necrophilia with the same arguments.
This is what next.
**
Sadly, yes.
While there have already been radical icons like Alan Ginsberg (who was a noted member of NAMBLA), I believe that the socialists will attempt to take this mainstream. The progressives will start brainwashing the college students. It’ll spread to school teachers and the radical clergy next. We’ll be asked to “understand” the motives of these creatures. Eventually, people who don’t want to see their kids raped will be painted by the media as extremists.
Even libs and lefties have a hard time letting some adult play doctor with their kids.
You can’t have a meaningful relationship with a child as some pedo activists (who are all gay, mind you) claim. As soon as the child attains puberty, the pedo would lose interest in them. It’s absurd to think otherwise.
Some scientists speculate that pedophilia evolved as a survival strategy (albeit a very poor one) in man’s early days. If a child was groomed to respond to you sexually, then you could impregnant her as soon as she was able to. Of course then you’d just move on to the next child and not care for her or your new offspring. Thus, the pedo benefited by passing on his genes at everyone else’s expense.
The last taboo, or would that be incest? Brother-sister marriage next?
The last taboo, or would that be incest? Brother-sister marriage next?
As many have predicted with the recognition of homosexual marriages comes the move to the idea that “pedophiles” need “love too”.
Pathetic.
Who didn’t see this coming?