Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog

Likewise. You build on a bunch of sandbars and a good storm will wipe you out. It wasn’t a super anything, it was stupidity matching up with probability.


28 posted on 01/02/2013 7:20:32 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (Save the nation, have your family's progressives spayed or neutered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: RetiredTexasVet

Sandy was only one part of a three part weather event. Three major weather systems collided: a southern late season hurricane that was very big … a high altitude Canadian jet stream that barreled in from the north … and a winter snow storm that approached from the west. A relatively strong nor’easter would have resulted if Sandy had not merged with these other systems.

When Sandy combined with the other storms it became a super storm. Sandy’s immense size also comes into play. The peak diameter of storm force winds with Irene was 460 miles, for Katrina it was 435 miles. These are very large distances but only half as big as Sandy at 943 miles. This almost thousand mile wide storm had the second most kinetic energy of any storm measured and it struck a densely populated area.

It also has to be noted that the super storm hit at high tide, during a full moon. Results would have been much different if Sandy had hit a barren coastline in North Carolina or Texas.


29 posted on 01/03/2013 11:44:29 AM PST by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson