[Gandalf_The_Gray]

The state’s citizens were never consulted when they made their original arrangement. If they truly wanted to keep their little private arrangement, the two mommies should be providing for the child not the citizens of the state.

Sounds about right to me...

Regards,
GtG

[xzins]

It’s a good thing for the FATHER (alias: sperm donor) to be required by law to support his own child.

This underscores a couple of conservative principles:

1. Homosexual couples are not procreative. This is the heart and soul of one major argument against homosexual marriage.

2. Ultimate Responsibility for one’s own procreative activity despite odd schemes and agreements to the contrary.

3. Unnatural marriage deprives a child of a role model whether male or female.